Browse by Subject
« Back to subjects starting with P
Skip to resultsPublic Utilities Commission (PUC)-Hearings
Showing 125 articles (page 4 of 5)
-
PSNH may need more big loans [Feb 12 1985 p1 col 4]
-
Bankers say investors not afraid of Seabrook [Feb 6 1985 p6 col 4]
-
Seabrook critics to question utility official [Feb 6 1985 p2 col 1]
-
Seabrook opponents want financing plan dismissed [Jan 24 1985 p14 col 3]
-
State regulators hear a sermon on the cost of Seabrook [Jan 17 1985 p1 col 1]
-
VEC official causes fur to fly at PUC session PSNH calls it hypocrisy, media event [Jan 17 1985 p6 col 1]
-
Bankruptcy might affect rate setting, two experts testify [Jan 16 1985 p2 col 5]
-
Bankruptcy experts testify on PUC role [Jan 16 1985 p1 col 1]
-
Unregulated rates spectre in bankruptcy experts: hassles, litigation may abound [Jan 16 1985 p8 col 1]
-
Bankruptcy expert says Public Service should have contingency plan [Jan 15 1985 p3 col 5]
-
Expert says law is designed to keep firms operating PUC learns about bankruptcy [Jan 15 1985 p5 col 1]
-
Alternative to unit 1 proposed Laconia businessman tells plan [Jan 12 1985 p5 col 4]
-
Chief engineer: unit I necessary for future [Jan 11 1985 p7 col 1]
-
Analyst predicts Seabrook will cost $6 to $8 million [Jan 10 1985 p4 col 4]
-
Analyst predicts $6 to $8 billion cost to complete Seabrook [Jan 10 1985 p10 col 1]
-
PUC hears about PSNH rate-cost cap costs top $4.5B by $100M already [Jan 10 1985 p8 col 1]
-
Analyst: Seabrook to cost $6B [Jan 9 1985 p24 col 2]
-
High PSNH rates would cost 9,100 jobs, expert says [Jan 9 1985 p6 col 1]
-
Witness: take six months to study bankruptcy option [Jan 9 1985 p3 col 1]
-
Legislator says Seabrook will cost state business [Jan 8 1985 p4 col 3]
-
Expert: PSNH managers fear for jobs [Jan 8 1985 p4 col 1]
-
Bankruptcy is better, consultant says [Jan 7 1985 p16 col 1]
-
Energy expert to state utility regualtors: 'scrape Seabrook' [Jan 5 1985 p1 col 1]
-
PSNH engineer testimony in direct opposition urges plant be built energy expert says conservation, not Seabrook [Dec 21 1984 p8 col 1]
Subjects: Hearings Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Public Utilities Commission (PUC)-Hearings Rocky Mountain InstituteSee also: SEE ALSO NT p27 -
Energy expert: abandon Seabrook and conserve energy [Dec 20 1984 p1 col 1]
Subjects: Hearings Newbrook Plan Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Public Utilities Commission (PUC)-HearingsSee also: SEE ALSO UL p5 & CM 12/21 p3